Leadership challenge

Your current role does not give you the experience the next one needs

You know what is missing. The problem is that the job you have will never provide it, however well you do it.

The gap is identified and it is not a gap you can close by trying harder, because the experience does not exist inside your current post. A head of department may not acquire whole-school strategic leadership through departmental work alone. A pastoral leader will not acquire curriculum leadership merely by observing it. This is an access problem rather than a follow-through problem, and the work is to create the opportunity: to find where the experience genuinely lives, and to propose something specific that someone would say yes to.

Presenting symptoms

  • Feedback on an application or a conversation about readiness has named something you have no way of demonstrating.
  • You have been offered involvement several times and none of it has carried any accountability.
  • You are doing your current job well and it has stopped teaching you anything.

Possible causes

  • The work may exist in your school and belong to someone who has no reason to share it.
  • The work may not exist at your level in your school at all, which points outwards rather than upwards.
  • What you have been given may have been observation rather than responsibility, which produces weak evidence of readiness.
  • You may have asked and been turned down, or asked and had nothing come of it, which are different problems.
Why can you not get it where you are?

The work exists here and it belongs to someone else.

Your most useful next step: Find out what would make them willing to share part of it, which usually means finding out what they would like taken off them. Then propose one defined piece with a start, an end and an outcome, and make the case in terms of what the school gets rather than what you need. A general offer to help is easy to decline and easy to forget.

Lead behaviours

The work does not exist at your level in this school.

Your most useful next step: Look outside the post rather than up the structure: a trust or federation project, a partner school, a subject or pastoral network, an examination board role, a governing body at another school. Test the assumption that it is unavailable before accepting it, because the barrier is often that nobody has asked rather than that the answer is no.

Lead behaviours

You have been given things like it and they turned out to be shadowing.

Your most useful next step: The difference is accountability. Ask for something you are answerable for, starting at the level where you decide and check before acting, and moving to full ownership as it goes well. Work without meaningful accountability produces weak evidence of readiness, and the people assessing you are likely to read it that way too.

Lead behaviours

You have asked, and either it was declined or nothing came of it.

Your most useful next step: Establish which of the two it was, because they need different responses. If it was declined, find out whether it was the request or the timing. If it was agreed and nothing happened, the fault is usually that the agreement had no shape: go back with a named piece of work, a deadline and an outcome, small enough that saying yes costs little.

Lead behaviours

Core behaviours

The book’s instruction is to understand before acting and to stay curious longer than feels comfortable. Before asking for an opportunity, the useful thing to find out is what the person holding it would like taken off them. An offer shaped around their problem is accepted; an offer shaped around your development is filed.

The book defines this as articulating purpose so that people understand rather than comply. Here you are on the other side of it: you are asking someone to give up part of their work, and they will agree to it in proportion to how clearly they can see what the school gains. A request framed around your career gives them nothing to say yes to.

This is the record’s instrument, read from the receiving side. The book sets out five levels of delegation, from doing exactly what is asked through to full ownership, and states that stretch assignments slightly beyond someone’s current skill set are what build readiness. Knowing those levels tells you what to ask for: the difference between useful experience and wasted terms is whether you are answerable for the outcome or reporting on it.

The book frames accountability as being answerable for outcomes and for conduct, and as an investment rather than a threat. What makes an opportunity count is that someone is entitled to hold you to it. Asking to be accountable is unusual and it is the thing that converts involvement into evidence.

The book distinguishes resilience from rigidity and warns against defending a plan because time has been invested in it. Applied here, the plan being defended is often the route: a leader who has decided the next step is available only inside their own school, or only in a particular form, will sit for years next to opportunities they have ruled out.

Secondary behaviours

Use this on the assumption that the experience is unavailable. The book’s argument is that the most significant barriers are frequently self-imposed and that past performance does not define future potential. A surprising proportion of unavailable opportunities turn out never to have been requested.

Use this where something was agreed and nothing happened. The book’s subject is the gap between intent and implementation, and its remedy is a named action with an owner and a deadline rather than a general commitment. An opportunity agreed in principle and never defined is a familiar way for a year to pass without anything changing.

Use this to establish which problem you actually have. Being declined and being forgotten look similar from the outside and need opposite responses, and most readers will have assumed the more discouraging of the two without checking.

A useful first action

Write down one defined piece of work that would give you the experience, with a start, an end and an outcome someone else would value. An opportunity you can describe in three lines is one someone can agree to.

Suggested approach

  1. Name the experience precisely, and check that it genuinely cannot be acquired in your present post.
  2. Work out where it actually lives: elsewhere in the school, elsewhere in the trust, or outside both.
  3. Find out what the person holding it would like taken off them.
  4. Propose one defined piece of work with a start, an end and an outcome, framed around what the school gains.
  5. Ask for accountability rather than involvement, beginning where you decide and check before acting.
  6. Be realistic about what you can carry alongside your existing job, and say so at the point of agreeing rather than afterwards.
A focused starting point, not a fixed answer. Investigate the cause, then apply professional judgement in your context.